WHO welfare scale pdf?

Use of welfare measures in primary health. In conclusion, WHO-5 is a short questionnaire consisting of 5 simple and non-invasive questions, which take advantage of the subjective well-being of the respondents. The total gross score, ranging from 0 to 25, is multiplied by 4 to obtain the final score, where 0 represents the worst well-being imaginable and 100 represents the best well-being imaginable. The World Health Organization (WHO) Wellness Index Five is a short self-reported measure of current mental well-being.

Therefore, the raw score theoretically varies from 0 (absence of well-being) to 25 (maximum well-being). The construct validity of a scale describes its properties as a coherent measure of a dimension of interest (in this case welfare). In his monograph on clinimetry, Feinstein used the term “post-treatment improvement” to describe the patient's own assessment of the change in well-being during treatment. Since scales that measure health-related quality of life are conventionally translated into a percentage scale from 0 (absent) to 100 (maximum), it is recommended that the raw score be multiplied by 4 (Fig.

When health-related quality of life was accepted as an important outcome in clinical trials, it is recommended to multiply the raw score by 4 (Fig. found that psychological well-being was an important element of this dimension. The measure was first introduced in its current form in 1998 by the WHO Regional Office in Europe as part of the DEPCARE project on welfare measures in primary health care. Therefore, they advocated the development of short global rating scales of subjective well-being, which would reflect a single dimension with high facial clinical validity.

If this is the case, the scale covers the theoretical range from total absence of well-being to the highest conceivable level of well-being. In addition, a generic scale allows a comparison with mean values of the general population (which can be used as a criterion for remission) or with mean values of other clinical populations regardless of the disease entity or condition under examination. This very successful dissemination of the scale is probably due to its direct language, which poses few translation problems and the fact that the questions do not seem to transgress any cultural norms in individual countries. PubMed conducted a search for “WHO (Five)” OR “WHO 5” OR “WHO 5” OR “WHO Welfare” OR “WHO 5” OR “WHO 5” OR “World Health Organization 5” or “World Health Organization Five”.

Many stress-related studies have been conducted using WHO 5 to measure suffering or poor well-being.

Estelle Palacios
Estelle Palacios

Proud zombie maven. Certified bacon specialist. Award-winning bacon maven. Lifelong tv junkie. Typical travel advocate.

Leave Message

All fileds with * are required